Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Native Package"

From WikEmacs
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]
 
Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]
 
:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 
:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 +
 +
: may be "built-in" is  better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

Revision as of 10:30, 5 April 2012

Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) Bozhidar

+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? GregLucas 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- Kindahero 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)