Category talk:Native Package - Revision history

Kindahero at 14:35, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T14:35:19Z

Francesco: /* Native vs Builtin */

2012-04-05T14:32:57Z

Native vs Builtin

Kindahero at 14:30, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T14:30:22Z

GregLucas at 14:25, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T14:25:40Z

Bozhidar at 14:19, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T14:19:32Z

Bozhidar: Native or Built-in

2012-04-05T14:19:17Z

Native or Built-in

New page

It's Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]
 :+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
+:: @GregLucas I am not sure there is one, '''Bots''' are meant for such things, wow edit conficts first time around I see on wikemacs.. So we are doing very well -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:35, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 : may be "built-in" is  better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 : I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. [[User:Francesco|Francesco]] 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 5 April 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero\|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)		: may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero\|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
		+
		+	: I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. [[User:Francesco\|Francesco]] 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 5 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]		Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]
	:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas\|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)		:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas\|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
		+
		+	: may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero\|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 5 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]		Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]
		+	:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas\|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 5 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It's Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]	+	Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar\|Bozhidar]]