Difference between revisions of "User talk:Xophist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comment about Spell Check article) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thanks for contributing. | Thanks for contributing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I added an explanation about RPMs to remove your confusion. I hope someone can provide a link to precompiled binaries. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I do try to find the proper template, but the new page template was overkill for this simple page. It made it look like all template and no content. I preferred a simple page for the article. The way it looks now is good, with much of the template excised. Thank you. [[User:Xophist|Xophist]] 22:52, 29 March 2012 (EEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 29 March 2012
- 2012-03-27
Just started.
Feel free to talk here. Once a thread is started, keep all comments in one place (your page or mine, it doesn't matter to me). Xophist 10:28, 28 March 2012 (EEST)
If you are creating or editing new pages apply proper template. I have revised your changes now. See Spell check. Your comments are confusing. Can one use RPMS on Windows. You may want to move SuSE specific things to GNU/Linux heading. Would you like to help with migrating some content from Emacswiki ispell page to this page.
Thanks for contributing.
- I added an explanation about RPMs to remove your confusion. I hope someone can provide a link to precompiled binaries.
- I do try to find the proper template, but the new page template was overkill for this simple page. It made it look like all template and no content. I preferred a simple page for the article. The way it looks now is good, with much of the template excised. Thank you. Xophist 22:52, 29 March 2012 (EEST)