Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Package"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to add some optional fields like latest version (ala wikipedia) and maybe something about the package's availability for installation via package.el (GNU ELPA, Marmalade, MELPA...) for third party packages. What do you think? [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]] | I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to add some optional fields like latest version (ala wikipedia) and maybe something about the package's availability for installation via package.el (GNU ELPA, Marmalade, MELPA...) for third party packages. What do you think? [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]] | ||
| − | Yes, it would be good to have that info as well. I will try to change that Package template according to that. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 14:36, 5 April 2012 (EEST) | + | :Yes, it would be good to have that info as well. I will try to change that Package template according to that. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 14:36, 5 April 2012 (EEST) |
Revision as of 11:37, 5 April 2012
I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to add some optional fields like latest version (ala wikipedia) and maybe something about the package's availability for installation via package.el (GNU ELPA, Marmalade, MELPA...) for third party packages. What do you think? Bozhidar
- Yes, it would be good to have that info as well. I will try to change that Package template according to that. -- Kindahero 14:36, 5 April 2012 (EEST)