Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PhilHudson (talk | contribs) |
PhilHudson (talk | contribs) (→Wikipedia linking convention: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Wikipedia linking convention == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could/should we have a convention for formatting and placement of wikipedia links on pages. | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 24 March 2012
I would like to structure the Main Page in boxes like here [1] the Featured Article/Project. Any objections? And maybe User:Bozhidar should write some lines about the relation to the "old" EmacsWiki?--Kenda 19:58, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Info link markup
Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? PhilHudson 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Mode naming convention
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. PhilHudson 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Wikipedia linking convention
Could/should we have a convention for formatting and placement of wikipedia links on pages.