Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Native Package"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST) | : may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. [[User:Francesco|Francesco]] 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 5 April 2012
Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) Bozhidar
- +1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? GregLucas 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
- may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- Kindahero 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
- I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. Francesco 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST)