Difference between revisions of "Lexical scope"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Lexical scope''' in general is the idea that: | + | [[Emacs_Lisp#Scope|'''Lexical scope''']] in general is the idea that: |
*an identifier at a particular place in a program always refers to the same variable location — where “always” means “every time that the containing expression is executed”, and that | *an identifier at a particular place in a program always refers to the same variable location — where “always” means “every time that the containing expression is executed”, and that | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In practice, lexical scoping is the norm for most programming languages, and probably corresponds to what you would intuitively consider to be “normal”. You may even be wondering how the situation could possibly — and usefully — be otherwise. | In practice, lexical scoping is the norm for most programming languages, and probably corresponds to what you would intuitively consider to be “normal”. You may even be wondering how the situation could possibly — and usefully — be otherwise. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 19:19, 28 October 2015
Lexical scope in general is the idea that:
- an identifier at a particular place in a program always refers to the same variable location — where “always” means “every time that the containing expression is executed”, and that
- the variable location to which it refers can be determined by static examination of the source code context in which that identifier appears, without having to consider the flow of execution through the program as a whole.
In practice, lexical scoping is the norm for most programming languages, and probably corresponds to what you would intuitively consider to be “normal”. You may even be wondering how the situation could possibly — and usefully — be otherwise.