Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PhilHudson (talk | contribs) (→Mode naming convention: new section) |
PhilHudson (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Info link markup == | == Info link markup == | ||
| − | Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? | + | Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET) |
== Mode naming convention == | == Mode naming convention == | ||
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | ||
Revision as of 20:10, 24 March 2012
I would like to structure the Main Page in boxes like here [1] the Featured Article/Project. Any objections? And maybe User:Bozhidar should write some lines about the relation to the "old" EmacsWiki?--Kenda 19:58, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Info link markup
Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? PhilHudson 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Mode naming convention
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. PhilHudson 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET)