Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET) | Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET) | ||
| − | == | + | == Describing Modes and Packages == |
| + | |||
| + | === Naming Conventions === | ||
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. [[User:PhilHudson|PhilHudson]] 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
Agreed, let's use the "friendly" name of a package. I'd say "Org", "Gnus", "YASnippet", etc. [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] | Agreed, let's use the "friendly" name of a package. I'd say "Org", "Gnus", "YASnippet", etc. [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] | ||
| + | === Built-ins vs Add-ons === | ||
| + | |||
| + | An article on a mode/package should indicate whether it is part of the Emacs distribution. When there is a list of packages, maybe we group the built-in ones first and then the add-ons? | ||
| + | [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] 00:53, 25 March 2012 (EET) | ||
== Wikipedia linking convention == | == Wikipedia linking convention == | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 24 March 2012
I would like to structure the Main Page in boxes like here [1] the Featured Article/Project. Any objections? And maybe User:Bozhidar should write some lines about the relation to the "old" EmacsWiki?--Kenda 19:58, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Info link markup
Could/should we have some standard way of marking up links to Info sections? PhilHudson 22:10, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Describing Modes and Packages
Naming Conventions
I'd like to suggest *not* suffixing (links to) modes with "-mode". Thus: "org" not "org-mode". For consistency I've been adding links titled "org-mode" until now, since that one was already created when I started. PhilHudson 22:09, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Agreed, let's use the "friendly" name of a package. I'd say "Org", "Gnus", "YASnippet", etc. GregLucas
Built-ins vs Add-ons
An article on a mode/package should indicate whether it is part of the Emacs distribution. When there is a list of packages, maybe we group the built-in ones first and then the add-ons? GregLucas 00:53, 25 March 2012 (EET)
Wikipedia linking convention
Could/should we have a convention for formatting and placement of wikipedia links on pages? PhilHudson 22:37, 24 March 2012 (EET)
EmacsWiki linking convention
Similar question to Wikipedia wrt EmacsWiki PhilHudson 23:06, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Template for mode-with-github-source pages?
Can Wikimedia do page templates? I'm sure the answer is yes. PhilHudson 23:07, 24 March 2012 (EET)