Difference between revisions of "Talk:Org"
SkydiveMike (talk | contribs) (Start a scope discussion) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:SkydiveMike|SkydiveMike]] 13:43, 24 March 2012 (EET) | [[User:SkydiveMike|SkydiveMike]] 13:43, 24 March 2012 (EET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Indeed. org-mode is actively developed outside Emacs and has an extremely good documentation. | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 24 March 2012
The devil, as always, is in the details. From Bozhidar Batsov’s original post:
Action Plan for The Maintainers:
Drop the current format of the wiki - use something standard like MediaWiki instead of OddMuse. Drop all the articles about Emacs extensions. Drop all the extensions hosted there. Assemble a team of moderators. Accept only articles about general Emacs usage and Emacs Lisp programming.
Give the above general action plan, I would think that we do not want to spend time and effort replicating documentation, tips-n-tricks, etc. from established projects that have these things. I added some basic links about the Org-Mode community, and don't really think we should go much further.
SkydiveMike 13:43, 24 March 2012 (EET)
Indeed. org-mode is actively developed outside Emacs and has an extremely good documentation.