Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Native Package"

From WikEmacs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Native or Built-in)
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It's Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]
+
Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) [[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]]
 +
:+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? [[User:GregLucas|GregLucas]] 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 +
:: @GregLucas I am not sure there is one, '''Bots''' are meant for such things, wow edit conficts first time around I see on wikemacs.. So we are doing very well -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:35, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 +
: may be "built-in" is  better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- [[User:Kindahero|Kindahero]] 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
 +
 
 +
: I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. [[User:Francesco|Francesco]] 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST)

Latest revision as of 14:35, 5 April 2012

Itsn't Built-in package a better term than native? I've never heard anyone using the term native for packages coming with Emacs, but I've seen built-in used a lot (even by package.el) Bozhidar

+1! Is there any mechanism to rename a category? GregLucas 17:25, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
@GregLucas I am not sure there is one, Bots are meant for such things, wow edit conficts first time around I see on wikemacs.. So we are doing very well -- Kindahero 17:35, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
may be "built-in" is better. I don't have any idea on this, I was just adding that since it was there before. -- Kindahero 17:30, 5 April 2012 (EEST)
I also think "built-in" is the most widely used terminology. Francesco 17:32, 5 April 2012 (EEST)